| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
|Message |
Doug Gochman Talent and/or Voice Producer

Joined: 16 Aug 2004 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008, 16:51 (GMT) Post subject: Anyone use a hand-held portable for recording VO auditions? |
|
|
Hi Folks,
Has anyone out there had any success with using one of those hand-held portables for recording VO? (examples: ZOOM H2; Marantz PMD620)
Ease of use, portability, sound quality issues are my concerns.
Thanks for your input!
-dg
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Chris Clementson Voice Seeker
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 216
|
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008, 00:33 (GMT) Post subject: |
|
|
| We are debating that very subject in another thread. I wouldn't expect much from the built-in mics or mic preamps. At minimum you will likely need an external mic preamp and go in through the line input.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Allen Brown Talent and/or Voice Producer - Voice Seeker

Joined: 22 Aug 2005 Posts: 520
|
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008, 15:11 (GMT) Post subject: |
|
|
Doug,
I bought the H4 for remote recording. It replaced my old portable DAT machine. It works great for that.
Yes, you could record an audition on your portable. And, I think I read where some talents have used them for that in some situations. But then you have to get it off the soundcard and into your computer for further editing/processing/uploading etc. So, why not just record into the computer in the first place?
Now, what if you actually get the gig you auditioned for on your portable? It's really not up to snuff for a finished, professional recording. So, you'd be faced with going to another studio for the final gig. I'd spend the money on a good mic, interface, quiet room and software before I bought the portable.
That's my take on it.
_________________ www.voiceover1.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
Erik Sheppard Talent and/or Voice Producer Moderator

Joined: 02 Mar 2005 Posts: 1317
|
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008, 15:33 (GMT) Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, this is being talked about all over the place here.
I am not the biggest tech geek here but I am going to go out on a limb and say this is a bad idea for VO. I think these were meant more for field recordings of FX or possibly interviews but even the best can't compete with a real mic/studio setup. This is not what they were built for.
If you want to just use it as storage along with a real VO worthy pre and mic, I suppose that would work but it just seems silly.
My apologies if I am missing something here.
_________________ voice talent Productions
erik@voicetalentproductions.com
SaVoa 07002 |
|
| Back to top |
|
Chris Clementson Voice Seeker
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 216
|
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008, 21:46 (GMT) Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | If you want to just use it as storage along with a real VO worthy pre and mic, I suppose that would work but it just seems silly.
My apologies if I am missing something here. |
Every time I've posted about CF recorders here I've given the caveat that you MUST bypass the internal mics and mic preamps. You MUST have a quality outboard mic preamp and of course your trusty RE20 or SM7b or whatever and go into the LINE INPUT. The internal mics and mic preamps are useless, at least on my Fostex they are. I would be shocked if there were one with good mic preamps.
A CF recorder is not so silly if you're on the road or if you're in the same room with a PC which sounds like a vacuum cleaner. I set up to do an oral history a few months ago and do you think I was going to lug a PC on an airplane from Los Angeles to New Rochelle, NY? Heck no; I used my trusty Fostex CF recorder and got fine results with it. Why not a laptop? Because they drop samples for various reasons. Also the CF recorder is more compact.
Welcome to the age of microelectronics! Guess what? The laptop you carry with one hand has thousands of times more computing power than the computers that occupied racks and racks of vacuum-tube gear back in the '40s. I can remember when it was not even possible to record audio on an Atari, Apple II or Commodore 64. All you got out of them were beeps and boops. Today, the electronic guts of a modern CF recorder -- the RAM, the CPU, the A/D and D/A converters, the amplifiers, the whole schmeer -- can be held in the palm of your hand and probably weigh less than a loaf of bread. They are not your father's Dictaphone. You can record at 24/48 and as I said in another post, the measured audio specs are up there in the "very good" category according to Rightmark.
http://audio.rightmark.org/index_new.shtml
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Erik Sheppard Talent and/or Voice Producer Moderator

Joined: 02 Mar 2005 Posts: 1317
|
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008, 22:00 (GMT) Post subject: |
|
|
My apologies Chris, apparently you have tried this out quite a bit and have had good results.
My prejudice may come from using 4-rackspace sized tube or solid state units made specifically for voice that cost a mint and still sucked. My road rig is a Edirol USB A/D box into a laptop and that is lacking as well.
Perhaps size really doesn't matter.
If I had a dime for every time I have said that........
_________________ voice talent Productions
erik@voicetalentproductions.com
SaVoa 07002 |
|
| Back to top |
|
Chris Clementson Voice Seeker
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 216
|
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008, 23:19 (GMT) Post subject: |
|
|
No apologies necessary. No offense taken.
Technology is moving so rapidly, together with overseas mass production (outsourcing) that it's astonishing how much audio gear a dollar will buy these days. And the quality is damn decent, despite what the snobs may say. Who ever thought you could get a large-diaphragm condenser mic -- and a darn good one from AKG or Audio Technica -- for $100? And those are post-inflation dollars! Back in the '70s or '80s you had to spend a few thousand, not a few hundred, to equip a studio that wouldn't be an embarrasment.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
George Whittam Voice Seeker

Joined: 26 Oct 2007 Posts: 21
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008, 18:47 (GMT) Post subject: Re: Anyone use a hand-held portable for recording VO auditio |
|
|
The M-AUDIO MICROTRACKII would be one of the few I would say could be up to snuff. It delivers true 48V phantom power to your mic through balanced connections. The first gen unit was widely praised for it's sound quality, but didn't supply the full 48v phantom that some mics require.
Check this PDF for a comparison chart of a wide range of recorders from BSW.
http://www.bswusa.com/assets/pdf/BSW_DigRecComparisonChart_v4.pdf
George
eldorec.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Chris Clementson Voice Seeker
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 216
|
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2008, 21:52 (GMT) Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | The M-AUDIO MICROTRACKII would be one of the few I would say could be up to snuff. It delivers true 48V phantom power to your mic through balanced connections. The first gen unit was widely praised for it's sound quality, but didn't supply the full 48v phantom that some mics require. |
Are you using the internal mic preamp, and if so, which mic are you using with it? I have a MicroTrack II which will be benchmarked after I finish my taxes
|
|
| Back to top |
|
P.M. Graham Talent and/or Voice Producer

Joined: 11 Dec 2007 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008, 14:55 (GMT) Post subject: HAND HELD MP3 PLAYERS WITH VOICE |
|
|
I Want to know can you use the MP3 PLayers with voice like RCA, etc to record your demos and if you do will the demo sound like it should when you upload it to this or any site? If it does not sound like it sounded when played back on the mp3 player or windows media player, what could be the reason for it and how can it be resolved.
Are there low cost software out there to make recording the demos easier or must you spend alot of money on audio software?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Emmanuel Soussan Talent and/or Voice Producer - Voice Seeker

Joined: 14 Feb 2004 Posts: 94
|
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008, 18:57 (GMT) Post subject: |
|
|
Here's a sample of the ZOOM H2 , sorry for my bad accent but it can gives u and idea of the sound quality !
| Description: |
|
 Download |
| Filename: |
ZOOM_H2_SAMPLE.mp3 |
| Filesize: |
493.01 KB |
| Downloaded: |
48 Time(s) |
_________________ RADIO IMAGING AND SOUND DESIGN
http://www.voixoffonline.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
Chris Clementson Voice Seeker
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 216
|
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008, 06:46 (GMT) Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | The M-AUDIO MICROTRACKII would be one of the few I would say could be up to snuff. |
I just got around to testing that Microtrack II today and consider it unacceptable. There is a "chuffing" noise which improves somewhat when the USB connector/AC power supply is unplugged. It sounds like some kind of digital clock noise is getting into the audio. My gut tells me this is more likely a design flaw rather than a manufacturing error (gone are the days when assembly line workers wearing shower caps stuffed components into boards - it's all SMT and automated these days). If it's not a design flaw then we have to wonder if their QC might be a bit lax. A Google search reveals that others have had noise problems with the Microtrack II.
I got a Zoom H4 today and it checks out nicely. It delivers 45.2V of phantom power (within spec) and costs half of what the Fostex costs. One downside of the H4 is the dinky display screen.
These things work well with hot condenser mics -- the hotter the better. One of the hottest is the Rode NT1A, a fine mic by any standard. With the hot output of the mic you can back off the recorder's internal preamp gain and get decent results.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Andy Quiñones Talent and/or Voice Producer

Joined: 19 Feb 2006 Posts: 187
|
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008, 15:32 (GMT) Post subject: |
|
|
Chris, when you tested the micro track II, you could have had the file format set at a low bit rate and therefore the poor sound quality?
Just an idea. I've heard a lot of good things about that unit although I use a Marantz PMD 670 with no probs.
_________________ Live truthfully under imaginary circumstances....--Stanislavski |
|
| Back to top |
|
Chris Clementson Voice Seeker
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 216
|
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008, 15:42 (GMT) Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Chris, when you tested the micro track II, you could have had the file format set at a low bit rate and therefore the poor sound quality? |
No, this is extraneous noise getting into the audio regardless of sample rate.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
J.S. Gilbert Talent and/or Voice Producer - Voice Seeker

Joined: 09 Nov 2003 Posts: 629
|
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2008, 21:16 (GMT) Post subject: CEll phone/ PDA |
|
|
SO here's a fun one for you. My telephone is a Treo 750, running windows mobile and I actually have done auditions from this phone and I booked two of them. (one was client request last minute audition and the other was an unexpected day trip turning into an overnighter.) Actually one of the auditions I booked was doen from my previous PDA phone, an Audiovox, but same principal. The sound quality isn't terrific, but I figured out where to hold it and how to speak to get the best results and I found a $20 simple editing tool online which allows me to edit and save as 44.1 16 bit wav file and send as an email attachment. The booth manager at the agent's office said he has gotten back worse sounding auditions from talent from their home studios. There is also a PDA version of Audacity available now.
This is a link to a page that discusses using PDA's as handheld recording devices. Therer are also some third partys that have developed SD microphone interfaces.
http://www.ebu.ch/en/technical/trev/trev_310-luci.pdf
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|